ARSAS: Active aging of the worker by spatial augmented reality
AbstractARSAS (Augmented reality supported Aging system), is a system developed for maintaining the work ability of older workers in industrial context. ARSAS integrates two main technologies the "video summarization" (automatic summary of video streams) and the spatial augmented reality. The system is able to project on the workbench surfaces pre-recorded instruction video and / or technical information from digital manuals. The operator performs his tasks normally, but is videotaped and, if necessary, assisted in his activities by AR instructions and multimedia. The main advantages of the system are: to provide a digital memory and reduce the cognitive load of the operator. A second benefit is that the system can easily acquire and store the knowledge of skilled and\or experienced workers in semi-automatic way. The preliminary tests showed a significant reduction in the risk of errors and execution times.
Bimber, O., Raskar, R., 2005. Spatial augmented reality: merging real and virtual worlds. CRC Press.
De Marchi, L., Ceruti, A., Marzani, A., Liverani, A. 2013. Augmented reality to support on-field post-impact maintenance operations on thin structures, Journal of Sensors.
Debernardis, S., Fiorentino, M., Gattullo, M., Monno, G., Uva, A.E., 2014. Text readability in head-worn displays: Color and style optimization in video versus optical see-through devices. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 20.1, 125-139.
Di Donato, M., Fiorentino, M., Uva, A.E., Gattullo, M., Monno, G., 2015. Text legibility for projected Augmented Reality on industrial workbenches. Computers in Industry 70, 70-78.
Fiorentino, M., Debernardis, S., Uva, A.E., Monno, G., 2013. Augmented reality text style readability with see-through head-mounted displays in industrial context. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 22.2, 171-190.
Fiorentino, M., Monno, G., Uva, A., 2009. Interactive â€œtouch and seeâ€ FEM Simulation using Augmented Reality. International Journal of Engineering Education 25.6.
Fiorentino, M., Uva A. E., Gattullo M., Debernardis S., Monno G., 2014. Augmented reality on large screen for interactive maintenance instructions. Computers in Industry 65.2, 270-278.
Ganier, F., 2004. Factors affecting the processing of procedural instructions: implications for document design. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on 47.1, 15-26.
Henderson, S., Feiner, S., 2011. Exploring the benefits of augmented reality documentation for maintenance and repair. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 17.10, 17.10, 1355-1368.
Navab N., 2004. Developing killer apps for industrial augmented reality. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 24.3, 16â€“20.
Tang A., Owen C., Biocca F., Mou W., 2003. Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 73-80. ACM.
Watson, G., Curran R., Butterfield J., Craig C., 2008. The effect of using animated work instructions over text and static graphics when performing a small scale engineering assembly. In: Collaborative product and service life cycle management for a sustainable world, pp. 541-550. Springer London.
Webel, S., Bockholt, U., Keil, J., 2011. Design criteria for AR-based training of maintenance and assembly tasks. In: Virtual and Mixed Reality-New Trends, pp. 123-132. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.