The role of Amyant in the asbestos exposure assessment in the chemical sector


  • Mario Grana ECO MONITOR, Via Bondeno, 9 - 00127 Roma, Italy; cell. ++39 339 1108525, e-mail:
  • Giuseppe Ripanucci ECO MONITOR, Roma
  • Laura Vicentini ECO MONITOR, Roma
  • Alberto Ripanucci ECO MONITOR, Roma



Asbestos, database, chemical sector


Although created by two technicians affiliated to INAIL, the data-base Amyant/DatAmiant cannot be considered an
official document of this Institution. INAIL in fact never claimed the ownership of the document, nor reported (or
simply cited) it in its Journals (Rivista degli Infortuni e delle Malattie Professionali, chapter Prevenzione e Sicurezza)
or any other official report. The data base is largely utilized in the evaluation process of the requests of people asking
for the application of normative benefits, nevertheless its content cannot be considered a reliable basis for the development
of the clinical decisional process, which needs accurate and rigorous background, especially in the case of
multi-factorial disorders such as pulmonary and laryngeal cancer, among others. The main weakpoint in Amyant is
represented by the acritical reference to data generated in Germany (Berufsgenossenschaften), which are much
higher than those actually occurring in a given occupational or non occupational context. These data are in fact generated
in the “worst scenario perspective†and cannot therefore be applied to standard situations. Another concern is
related to the way in which data referred to the chemical branch, whose activities are not explicitely reported. This
means that the evaluation of the risk of the exposure to asbestos often requires the identification of a task as similar
as possible to the target one. This process may lead to different and often misleading outcomes. The procedures are
in fact complex, and often requires a subjective evaluation. The environmental and occupational setting must be
taken into account, and the reliability of the data must be accurately checked (by means of bibliographic search).
Data generated by Berufsgenossenschaften must be “a priori†discarded, for the above-exposed reasons; unrelated
occupational activities cannot be considered: first of all, for the examined branch, those in which asbestos itself, or
asbestos-containing material, are the core of the task (e.g. asbestos clearance, asbestos extraction, production or processing-
as main occupational activity- of asbestos containing material); second, other occupational branches unrelated
to chemistry such as construction industry, boatyards, Enel power plants, glassmakers, cannot be considered
unless in selected instances, in the case of their explicit indication. On the basis of the above reported exclusion criteria,
the tasks reported in specific chapters or paragraphs of DatAmiant which may be of interest for workers involved
in routinary tasks in the Chemical branch, are reported.


Berufsgenossenschaftliehe Hinweise zur Ermittlung der kumulativen Asbestfaserstaub-Dosis am Arbeitsplatz (Faserjahre) und Bearbeitungshin weise zur Berufskrankheit Nr. 4104 (Lungenkrebs). BK-Report 1/93, 1993. Hrsg.: Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften (HVBG), Sankt Augustin.

Bonsib, R.S., 1937. Dust producing operations in the production of petroleum products and associated activities. New York, Standard Oil Company of New Jersey.

Cheng, R., Mc Dermott, H., 1991. Exposure to asbestos from asbestos gaskets. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 6, 588 - 591.

Cherrie, J.W., Tindall, M., Cowie, H., 2005. Exposure and risks from wearing asbestos mitts. Part. Fibre Toxicol., 2, 5.

Consensus Report, 1997. Asbestos, asbestosis, and cancer: the Helsinki criteria for diagnosis and attribution. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health., 23, 311 - 316.

Hervin, R.L., Rivera, R., Flesch, J.P., 1973. Health hazard evaluation report for Mobil Oil Corporation. Augusta, KS. Washington, DC: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH pub. no. PC-229-514.

Mc Kinnery, W.N., Moore, R.W., 1992. Evaluation of airborne asbestos fiber levels during removal and installation of valve gaskets and packing. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 53, 531 - 532.

Ripanucci, G., 1992. Guida metodologica per l’accertamento del rischio di silicosi. Consulenza Tecnica Rischi Professionali, INAIL.

Ripanucci, G., Casini, S., 1995. Software per il calcolo del tempo d’uso di un otoprotettore per mantenere il livello di esposizione personale quotidiano al rumore al di sotto di un valore prefissato. Riv. Inf. Mal. Prof., 6, 529 - 538.

Sacco, A., Ripanucci, G., 2010. L’ingrato ed oneroso compito del CTU nelle Vertenze sui benefici previdenziali degli ex-esposti ad amianto. G. Ital. Med. Lav. Erg. , 32 (4), suppl. 2, 362.

Samimi, B., Williams, A., 1981. Occupational exposure to asbestos fibers resulting from use of asbestos gloves. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 42, 870 - 875.

Spence, S., Rocchi, P., 1996. Exposure to asbestos fibers during gasket removal. Ann. Occup. Hyg., 40, 583 - 588.

Verdel, U., Iotti, A., Castellet Y Ballarà , G., 1997. Mappa storica dell’esposizione all’amianto nell’industria italiana. Riv. Inf. Mal. Prof., 3, 343 - 365.

Williams, P.R.D., Phelka, A.D., Paustenbach, D.J., 2007. A review of historical exposures to asbestos among skilled craftsmen (1940-2006). Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B., 10, 319 - 377.




Opinions and Comments